Reflection on One America Summit 2025
- Phil Van Eck
- 13 hours ago
- 4 min read
This reflection was originally written on May 16, 2025 to report on the event to a sponsoring organization. It is being published here now to reflect on this topic before attending Summit 2026.
________________
Over three days of deep conversation, powerful testimony, and courageous leadership, I
was moved and challenged at the One America Movement in Tulsa this May. I came
eager to understand how faith communities can respond to deepening division and
polarization. I left with a clearer vision, not just of what’s possible, but of what is required
of faith communities to lead the work of combatting toxic polarization.
One of the earliest insights came from Andrew Hanauer, who reminded us that spiritual
communities are built to hold tension. That conviction came to life in the stories of Rabbi
Fred Reeves and Shaykh Ibad Wali (OAM experts of the Jewish and Muslim faith), who
now meet weekly amid the violence and trauma of the Israel - Hamas war. This echoed
again in the partnership of Hurunnessa Fariad (Muslim civic leader) and Pastor Joel
Rainey, despite backlash from their own communities. I was convicted by their example
as they reminded me that love of neighbor is not just a belief we affirm; it’s something we
practice, sometimes at personal cost.
That same spirit also shaped one of the summit’s most powerful themes: solidarity in
suffering. These and many other Jewish and Muslim leaders found one another in
lament, even while carrying grief from different sides of a shared tragedy. These leaders
demonstrated that empathy and compassion, even with those you disagree, is not
weakness. It is a spiritual practice that strengthens community. It develops but also
requires strength in the form of humility, mutual respect, and a deep regard for human
safety and dignity.
Speakers like Pastor Rainey, Rabbi Jonah Pesner, and Munir Shaikh also called
attention to the responsibility of majority communities to ensure that minority voices are
heard, protected, and empowered. As an evangelical, it was painful to hear Rainey
reflect on the church’s failure to defend the dignity of our Muslim neighbors in today’s
political and religious climates. He challenged us to reconsider how we use power: not to
protect privilege, but to extend equity. Rabbi Pesner added that real unity isn’t forged
through sameness, but through shared purpose and moral courage. Rabbi Pesner
invited us to pursue, through our power and influence, the familiar idea of shalom, which
is not simply the absence of conflict, but a wholeness grounded in justice for people of
all faiths and beliefs.
Rev. Brandon Cleaver and Daniel McIntosh called to mind and gave words to what many
of us feel and see regularly in our society, especially in the media: the contrast between
peacemakers and polarizers. Their insights on peacemaking through curiosity,
accountability, and mutual care challenged me to reflect on my own posture, especially
in digital spaces. Kurt Gray built on this with his “CIV: Connect, Invite, Validate” model,
offering a practical path toward deeper understanding with those we meet across these
divides.Throughout the summit, I was struck by stories of collaboration between people with
stark ideological differences. Many voices echoed the idea that dialogue across divides
doesn’t threaten or water down anyone’s beliefs—it tests them, and if they’re real, they
are sharpened and grow stronger. One of the most compelling examples came from
Rev. Marian Edmonds-Allen and Derek Monson, who, despite holding deeply different
views, found common ground in their shared commitment to support LGBTQ+ youth in
crisis. Their partnership showed that when we lead with relationship and shared
purpose, even profound disagreement can give way to meaningful cooperation for the
good of others. Munir Shaikh helped reframe how faith communities think about
difference by reminding us that the true divide isn’t simply between believer and non-
believer, but between those who build peace and those who perpetuate division.
Conviction, he said, is revealed through a commitment to coexistence.
I left the summit more aware of the forces that divide us, but also more hopeful about
what might bring us together. Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols’s words stayed with me:
Scripture means nothing if not lived. The real test is whether our faith communities enact
what we profess. With the right spiritual maturity, we can engage across these lines
without losing who we are personally, but also strengthening who we are collectively.
The summit clarified the kind of faith community I hope to be part of: one that leans into
difference with grace, stands with the marginalized with conviction, and measures faith
not by how certain we are, but by how well we love across the lines that divide us.
________
As I now step into a new season of consulting work, I’m still discerning how exactly this
summit’s themes connect to my own vocation. The business I’ve begun is rooted in
helping people connect and collaborate more effectively, and I chose the name Uniëa to
reflect a commitment to that unity. My hope, though, is that this work won’t just help
teams operate better but will extend that unity into the communities these teams serve
and foster connection across societal lines of identity, context, and conviction. I may not
yet know exactly how my work fits into the broader effort to combat toxic polarization, but
this summit affirmed that it needs to, and I’m committed to finding my part in that calling.

